Thursday, February 18, 2010
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
It seems that the time stream has been radically altered. Two alternate realities have met and the world hasn't been destroyed. Time travel has happened and a few temporal marauders have drastically altered history as we know it!
And it's all good!
I'm not talking about Delorean's with flux capacitors or a TARDIS transversing time and space, or even H.G. Wells' steampunk style time machine. I'm talking about the Retro Clone Movement or the OSR!
Dungeons & Dragons has been taken in a direction that it didn't take back in 1979 or so.
We've got Swords & Wizardry that hasn't departed from the original 1974 rules but has given it's own twist within those very rules (like the ascending/descending combat system).
There's Labyrinth Lord which gives us the Moldvay/Cook rules as they were in the original printing, and in an advanced and original 1974 style of play as well. Plus Mutant Future which takes Gamma World using OE rules.
OSRIC has given us a vision of the First Edition rules in one very playable and well edited volume.
Worlds collide in The Basic Fantasy Roleplaying Game, OE meets 3.0 to create a chimera game that is very fun to play!
X-Plorers has brought the OSR to outer space!
We have Three Headed Dragons and Brave Halflings leading the charge!
And not to mention a horde of bloggers who are too numerous to name but you all know who you are.
People said it couldn't be done. People said this was just a pathetic nostalgia trip. You've proved them wrong, won awards and have caused the corporate giants to finally look your way. Maybe we'll hear the term "old school" used as a marketing word.
I just wanted to say thanks! Thanks for transgressing the laws of time!
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Monday, February 15, 2010
The guys at Kenzer & Company sent me a free pdf copy of Hack Master Basic, so I thought I would post my thoughts on it. This is my first real review of an rpg product so I hope I don't fall short on expectations.
When I heard about this products upcoming release, I was pretty stoked. I really like Hack Master and the way it was executed, but found the 400 page rulebook to be a little daunting. Hack Master Basic was paired down to 200 pages making it a little more readable (although the original AD&D players handbook was around 126 pages).
Right at the beginning there's a quick start rules section that will get you into gameplay with a minimum of reading. Allowing for the additional rules to be added later once you ease into the groove of Hack Master game play. This is a plus for my ADHD sensibilities. This is also a nod towards "Old School" play.
Characters have seven attributes: Strength, Intelligence, Wisdom, Dexterity, Constitution, Looks and Charisma. Plus you have an Honor (honor being a measure of deeds of the character and the character's associates) score which is the total of the seven attributes divided by 7.
Character class choices are: Fighters, Thieves, Clerics and Mages.
Character races are: Human, Dwarf, Elf or Halfling.
So far fairly old school. The introduction of weapon proficiencies and skills represents the newer school game design. I'm not completely for or against proficiencies and skills. It's nice to be able to give your character an edge that makes him/her stand out a little in the game.
I'm not a fan of the quirk and flaw chart, where you add depth to your character by giving him/her character flaws. I can see using it on the fly if you can't really think of anything but over all I would omit this part from my game. I think the quirks and flaws should develop during game to add depth to the role playing rather than adding something to a character sheet. But this is just a minor gripe.
Then each character class receives a supply package that would fit the appropriate class. I like this a lot, it makes it a lot easier for on the fly games so you don't have to check out the supply list and decide what you need for your character.
There's a nice list of mage and cleric spells. And a comprehensive combat system with a very nice example of combat in the book. Just reading about the system isn't enough for me personally, having an example of play really helps out.
There's a sections titled Miscellaneous Rules which covers things like falling damage, healing time, illumination, doors & portcullises and aging. And also a section on detailed character backgrounds. I would probably omit some of these rules, especially the character backgrounds. I think that a character's background should be a little more free form, and up to the player as to what that character's background should be. But the way they are presented in the book makes it easier to decide which ones you want to use in your campaign.
There's a very extensive section on gaming dice which I have never really seen in an RPG before. It covers topics like Choosing/Purchasing your dice, dice etiquette, roll zones, priming, care and maintenance, lucky dice, bad dice, dice cleaning etc. I've never thought about some of the topics about dice maintenance before, I found it very interesting.
The addition of a game master's section with a nice list of monsters, treasure, potions and magic items make this a completely playable game in one volume!
The artwork throughout the book is beautiful, with an Erol Otus illustration on the front cover. And lot's of black & white illustrations inside, many of which are homages to older editions of gaming illustrations.
Over all I would say this game rates as AD&D era of old school game play rather than OE. There are a lot of rules for most situations and isn't a completely free form style of play. But I do intend on giving the game a chance. There's a group in my gaming community that want's to start playing Hack Master, so I hope to steer them towards the basic game.
My rating system is based on my Barsoomian White Ape that I keep in a cage in my basement. As we all know White Apes have 4 arms with 4 hands and 4 thumbs. One thumb being the low score and 4 thumbs being the high score.
My ape gives Basic Hackmaster 3 thumbs up, if it was a little more rules light it would've gotten 4.